How to Use Between-Session Experiments in Creativity Coaching Without Turning Them Into Homework

By /

How to Use Between-Session Experiments in Creativity Coaching Without Turning Them Into Homework

A creativity coaching session ends with a useful conversation.

The client has gained clarity, identified an important question and appears ready to move forward.

Then the coach asks:

“What are you going to do before our next session?”

Sometimes that question is exactly what the client needs.

Other times, it quietly turns coaching into homework.

The client leaves with a list of tasks, feels pressure to complete everything and returns to the next session expecting to explain why they succeeded or failed.

Instead of curiosity, the space between sessions becomes a performance test.

Creativity coaching can take a different approach.

Between-session work can be designed as an experiment rather than an assignment.

An experiment gives the client an opportunity to test an idea, observe a pattern, try a different behaviour, gather information or explore a creative possibility.

The objective is not simply:

“Did you do your homework?”

It becomes:

“What did you discover?”

This distinction is especially useful in creativity coaching because creative work involves uncertainty, experimentation and changing information.

This guide explains how creativity coaches can use between-session experiments professionally, how to keep ownership with the client, what to do when an experiment is not completed and how to use the next session to turn experience into learning.

Contents

What Is a Between-Session Coaching Experiment?

A between-session coaching experiment is a small action, observation or test that a client chooses to undertake between coaching conversations in order to learn something useful.

It might involve:

  • Trying a different creative routine.
  • Testing one version of an idea.
  • Observing when a particular creative block appears.
  • Having a conversation the client has been avoiding.
  • Reducing the scope of a project and seeing what changes.
  • Working under a deliberate constraint.
  • Tracking how the client makes creative decisions.
  • Testing a small prototype.
  • Experimenting with a new way of responding to self-doubt.

The word experiment is important.

It suggests that the outcome is not completely known.

The client is not being asked to prove that they can perform correctly.

They are gathering information.

Experiment vs Homework: What Is the Difference?

There is nothing inherently wrong with homework.

Some clients may even prefer clear tasks.

The problem begins when every coaching conversation automatically ends with something the coach assigns.

A homework mentality can sound like:

“You need to write for an hour every morning before our next session.”

An experimental approach may sound like:

“You mentioned that mornings might work better for your writing. Is there anything you would like to test before we meet again?”

The difference is not merely wording.

It concerns ownership.

In the first example, the coach has largely decided what the client should do.

In the second, the client remains responsible for deciding whether an experiment would be useful and what form it should take.

Homework often asks:

Did you complete the task?

An experiment asks:

What happened when you tried it?

This creates a very different learning environment.

Why Between-Session Experiments Can Be Useful

Coaching conversations create reflection.

But clients live their creative lives outside the session.

Between-session experiments connect the conversation with real experience.

They can help clients test assumptions

A client might say:

“I can only create when I have at least three uninterrupted hours.”

Rather than debating the assumption, the client could test shorter sessions.

They can turn uncertainty into information

A client may not know which creative direction is stronger.

Testing a small version of each option may provide more information than another hour of speculation.

They can reveal patterns

A client who believes they “always procrastinate” may observe when avoidance actually occurs.

Perhaps it appears mainly before tasks involving evaluation or exposure.

They can create movement

A very small experiment can help a client move from abstract thinking into direct experience.

They can support independence

Clients learn that they can investigate their own questions instead of waiting for the coach to provide answers.

This is particularly useful when coaching is connected to a meaningful creative project. The guide on coaching clients through meaningful creative projects without turning everything into productivity explores this broader distinction between useful movement and simple output.

The Client Should Own the Experiment

A coach can help shape an experiment without taking ownership of it.

This distinction matters.

Imagine a client who wants to develop a writing practice.

The coach says:

“Write 500 words every day and send me your word count.”

This may work for some clients.

But the coach has now become the designer and monitor of the client’s routine.

Compare that with:

“What would you like to learn about the conditions under which writing becomes easier for you?”

The client might decide to test:

  • Morning versus evening.
  • Twenty minutes versus one hour.
  • Writing with an outline versus writing freely.
  • Writing at home versus elsewhere.

Now the client is exploring their own process.

The coach supports the learning.

The client owns the experiment.

What Makes a Good Between-Session Experiment?

Useful coaching experiments tend to have several characteristics.

They are connected to the coaching goal

An experiment should not be random activity.

It should help answer a question relevant to what the client wants from coaching.

They are small enough to attempt

An experiment should usually reduce uncertainty without requiring an enormous commitment.

They have a learning purpose

The client should understand what they are trying to discover.

They allow more than one useful outcome

An experiment can be useful even when the expected result does not occur.

They remain within the client’s control

Where possible, focus on actions the client can actually undertake rather than external outcomes they cannot guarantee.

They are reviewed

An experiment that is never discussed again can become another forgotten task.

The learning comes partly from reflection.

Start With a Question, Not a Task

One of the easiest ways to improve between-session work is to begin with a question.

Instead of:

“Post three pieces of work this week.”

Ask:

“What are you trying to learn about sharing your work?”

The client might answer:

“I want to know whether posting unfinished work feels as uncomfortable as I imagine.”

Now an experiment can be designed around the actual question.

Other experiment questions might include:

  • What happens if I reduce this project by half?
  • Which part of the process creates the most resistance?
  • Does feedback improve this idea or confuse it?
  • Do I work differently when the goal is exploration rather than completion?
  • What happens if I stop editing while drafting?
  • Which of these two directions gives me more useful material?

A clear question makes the experiment easier to review.

Make the Experiment Small Enough to Learn From

Clients sometimes design enormous experiments.

For example:

“Before our next session I’m going to completely redesign my website, launch a new offer and post every day.”

That is not a small experiment.

It is several projects.

A creativity coach can help the client reduce the scope.

Perhaps the actual uncertainty is:

“I don’t know whether this new offer makes sense to potential clients.”

A smaller experiment might be:

  • Write a one-paragraph description.
  • Show it to three relevant people.
  • Ask what they believe the offer does.
  • Record what is unclear.

This may produce more useful information than building the entire offer first.

Small experiments are not less ambitious.

They can simply reduce the cost of learning.

The site’s guide on turning creative experiments into better ideas goes deeper into how experimentation can improve creative development itself.

Examples of Between-Session Experiments for Different Creative Clients

For a writer

Question: Does editing while drafting cause me to lose momentum?

Experiment: Complete two short writing sessions without editing anything until the end.

Review: What happened to pace, anxiety and quality?

For a visual artist

Question: Am I rejecting ideas too quickly?

Experiment: Develop three rough versions of an idea before evaluating any of them.

Review: Did additional exploration change which direction seemed strongest?

For a performer

Question: What happens when I deliberately practise without trying to impress anyone?

Experiment: Run one private practice session focused only on exploration.

Review: What changed in attention, risk-taking or enjoyment?

For a creative entrepreneur

Question: Does my audience understand what this service is for?

Experiment: Present a simple description to several appropriate people before building the full offer.

Review: Which parts were immediately clear and which created confusion?

For a client struggling with creative confidence

Question: Am I avoiding sharing because the work is genuinely unfinished or because I fear judgment?

Experiment: Identify one low-risk piece that is complete enough to share with a trusted audience.

Review: Compare the expected reaction with what actually happened.

For a client with too many projects

Question: Would focusing on one project reduce or increase my creative energy?

Experiment: Give one project primary attention for a defined short period while recording new ideas without acting on them.

Review: What happened to focus, anxiety and progress?

Accountability Without Turning the Experiment Into Pass or Fail

Accountability is often helpful in coaching.

But accountability does not have to mean inspection.

A weak accountability conversation sounds like:

“Did you complete everything you promised?”

A more useful conversation might begin:

“What happened when you tried the experiment?”

This allows several legitimate outcomes.

Outcome 1: The experiment worked as expected

What does the client want to do with that information?

Outcome 2: The opposite happened

What assumption needs to be reconsidered?

Outcome 3: The result was mixed

Does the client need a different experiment?

Outcome 4: The experiment was not completed

That also provides information.

The question becomes why.

What If the Client Does Not Complete the Experiment?

This is an important coaching moment.

A coach can easily become a disappointed teacher.

Avoid responses such as:

“You said you were going to do this. Why didn’t you?”

Instead, become curious.

Ask:

  • What happened?
  • When did you first know you were unlikely to do it?
  • Did the experiment still feel relevant?
  • Was it too large?
  • Was the purpose unclear?
  • Did another priority become more important?
  • Was there discomfort you wanted to avoid?
  • Did you choose the experiment or did you feel you should agree to it?

A missed experiment can expose a problem with the design.

It can reveal avoidance.

It can reveal an unrealistic goal.

It can reveal that the client was trying to please the coach.

Simply reassigning the same task misses the learning opportunity.

When No Between-Session Action Is Appropriate

Not every coaching session needs to end with an action.

This is especially important for new coaches to understand.

A session may produce:

  • A significant decision that needs time to settle.
  • New awareness that the client wants to observe.
  • A difficult realization that does not require immediate action.
  • A need to rest before making another creative commitment.
  • A decision to stop doing something rather than add another task.

The pressure to end every session with homework can cause coaches to invent unnecessary actions simply to make the session feel productive.

Sometimes the most appropriate between-session intention is:

“Notice what happens.”

Sometimes it is:

“Give yourself a week before deciding.”

Sometimes there is no experiment at all.

This does not automatically make the session incomplete.

How to Review a Between-Session Experiment in the Next Coaching Session

Do not spend thirty seconds checking whether the action happened and immediately move to a new topic.

If the experiment was designed to create learning, make room for that learning.

Step 1: Ask what happened

Begin with description rather than evaluation.

“Walk me through what happened.”

Step 2: Compare expectation with reality

Ask:

“What did you expect, and what actually happened?”

Step 3: Identify surprises

Unexpected results can be especially useful.

Step 4: Identify learning

Ask:

“What do you know now that you did not know before?”

Step 5: Decide what the learning changes

Does the client want to:

  • Continue the approach?
  • Modify it?
  • Test something else?
  • Abandon the assumption?
  • Make a decision?

This is also why good progress reviews look beyond task completion. The guide on measuring progress in creativity coaching explains how learning, clarity and increased independence can count as meaningful progress.

A Practical TEST Framework for Between-Session Experiments

Creativity coaches can use the following simple framework.

T — Target the question

What does the client want to understand?

Example:

“I want to know whether reducing my project scope would make it easier to start.”

E — Establish the experiment

What small action could provide useful information?

Example:

“I’ll create the smallest version of the project outline that would still feel meaningful.”

S — Set the boundaries

Clarify:

  • How long the experiment will run.
  • What the client will actually do.
  • What they are not trying to accomplish.
  • What they want to observe.

T — Turn the result into learning

In the next session, explore:

  • What happened?
  • What surprised the client?
  • What changed?
  • What should happen next?

The TEST framework is not meant to become another rigid coaching technique.

Its purpose is simply to prevent between-session action from becoming disconnected homework.

25 Questions for Designing Better Between-Session Experiments

Clarifying the question

  1. What are you uncertain about?
  2. What would you like to understand before our next conversation?
  3. Which assumption would be useful to test?
  4. What are you currently predicting will happen?
  5. What information would help you make the next decision?

Designing the experiment

  1. What could you try?
  2. What is the smallest useful version?
  3. How much time would be enough?
  4. What part is within your control?
  5. What would make this realistic?

Protecting ownership

  1. Is this something you actually want to try?
  2. Why does this experiment matter to you?
  3. Would you still choose this if I had not suggested it?
  4. What would you change about the experiment?
  5. What level of commitment feels appropriate?

Defining learning

  1. What will you observe?
  2. What would surprise you?
  3. What would count as useful information?
  4. What could you learn even if the experiment does not work?
  5. How will you remember what happened?

Preparing for review

  1. What question should we revisit next time?
  2. What might make you change the experiment?
  3. What could prevent you from doing it?
  4. What will you do if the result is unclear?
  5. What decision might this experiment help you make?

Keep Between-Session Experiments Within Coaching Scope

An experiment should not become a way for the coach to move outside appropriate professional boundaries.

For example, the coach should consider:

  • Whether the activity is connected to the agreed coaching purpose.
  • Whether the client is choosing it voluntarily.
  • Whether the coach is competent to support the issue involved.
  • Whether another professional is more appropriate.
  • Whether the experiment introduces unnecessary risk.

A good coaching agreement can help create this clarity from the beginning. Review what every coach and client should clarify in a creativity coaching agreement for a broader discussion of scope, expectations and responsibilities.

What Trainee Creativity Coaches Should Practise

New coaches can become uncomfortable when a session does not end with a clear action.

They may therefore rush to ask:

“So what are you going to do?”

That question is not wrong.

But trainees should learn to notice whether they are asking it because the client needs action or because the coach needs the session to feel complete.

After a practice session, reflect on:

  • Who chose the between-session action?
  • Did the action connect with the client’s goal?
  • Was it an experiment or simply a task?
  • Was the experiment small enough?
  • Did we clarify what the client wanted to learn?
  • Did I pressure the client into agreeing?
  • Would no action have been more appropriate?
  • How will I review the experiment next time?

This is one of several patterns that developing coaches need to recognize. The article on 15 common mistakes new creativity coaches make in client sessions explores related habits that can unintentionally reduce client autonomy.

Common Mistakes With Between-Session Coaching Activities

1. Assigning rather than collaborating

The coach decides what the client should do and the client agrees because they feel expected to.

2. Making the experiment too large

The client leaves with a project rather than a test.

3. Having no learning question

Activity occurs, but neither coach nor client knows what it was supposed to clarify.

4. Treating non-completion as failure

The coach misses information contained in why the action did not happen.

5. Never reviewing the experiment

The coach assigns another action without extracting the learning from the previous one.

6. Giving every client the same exercise

Between-session experiments should arise from the client’s actual situation.

7. Confusing activity with progress

A busy client is not automatically moving toward a meaningful goal.

8. Creating dependence on coach approval

The client begins working mainly to report successful completion to the coach.

9. Ending every session with homework automatically

Sometimes observation, reflection, rest or no action at all is appropriate.

10. Ignoring the amount of time between sessions

An experiment should fit the rhythm of the coaching relationship.

If the timing between sessions itself needs review, the guide on brief versus longer-term creativity coaching can help frame decisions about session frequency and duration.

Between-Session Experiments Should Increase Client Capability

The strongest between-session experiments do more than move one project forward.

They help clients learn how to investigate their own creative challenges.

A client may gradually learn to ask:

  • What am I assuming?
  • What do I actually know?
  • What could I test?
  • What is the smallest useful experiment?
  • What happened?
  • What did I learn?
  • What should I change?

At that point, experimentation has become part of the client’s independent creative capability.

The coach does not need to invent every next step.

The client increasingly knows how to generate useful next steps themselves.

That is an important shift.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should creativity coaches give clients homework?

They can agree on between-session activities when those activities are useful, but they do not need to assign homework after every session. Collaborative experiments can often preserve more client ownership.

What is a between-session coaching experiment?

It is a small action, observation or test that a client undertakes between sessions to learn something relevant to their coaching goal.

What is the difference between coaching homework and an experiment?

Homework often emphasizes task completion, while an experiment emphasizes learning from what happens. The distinction also depends on who owns the action and why it is being undertaken.

Should every coaching session end with an action?

No. Some sessions appropriately end with reflection, a decision, observation or time to process rather than another task.

What should a coach do if a client does not complete an agreed experiment?

Explore what happened without immediately treating the situation as failure. The experiment may have been too large, unclear, no longer relevant or affected by an important pattern worth discussing.

How large should a between-session experiment be?

Generally, it should be small enough to attempt realistically while still producing useful information.

Can an unsuccessful experiment still be useful?

Yes. Unexpected or unsuccessful results can reveal assumptions, obstacles and alternative directions.

How should an experiment be reviewed?

Discuss what the client expected, what actually happened, what surprised them, what they learned and what they want to do with that information.

Can experiments help creative clients become more independent?

Yes. Clients can learn to test assumptions and generate information themselves rather than depending entirely on the coach for answers.

Are between-session experiments suitable for every creativity coaching client?

No single technique is appropriate for every client or every session. The coach and client should determine whether an experiment actually serves the agreed coaching purpose.

Develop Professional Creativity Coaching Skills

Using between-session experiments well requires more than giving clients things to do.

A creativity coach needs to listen carefully, protect client ownership, help make experiments realistic and turn experience into useful reflection.

These are professional coaching skills that become stronger through structured learning and practice.

Explore the Creativity Coach Certification Program for information about the professional training pathway.

You can also review the Online Creativity Coach Certification Course.

For UK-focused program information, visit the Creativity Coaching Certification Program in the United Kingdom.

Professionals specifically researching training in London can explore the Creativity Coaching Certification Course in London.

Scroll to Top